The movie received generally negative reviews from critics. The review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reported that 12% of critics gave the movie positive reviews, based on 57 reviews — with the consensus that "If its plot were as interesting as its torture devices, or its violence less painful than its performances, perhaps Saw V might not feel like it was running on fumes." Metacritic reported the film had an average score of 20 out of 100, based on 10 reviews.
Elizabeth Weizman of the New York Daily News believed that the lack of Tobin Bell's character hurt the movie: "Bell's deliciously twisted madman was the lifeline of this series, and without him, we're left watching a routine horror flick that might as well have gone straight to DVD. The series began with two major assets that set it apart: the concept of a brilliantly righteous executioner, and the actor who played him. Now, aside from Bell's brief, intermittent cameos, it has neither. So where the original Saw was diabolical fun, this fifth installment is as bloodless as the most unfortunate of Jigsaw's victims." Sam Adams of the Los Angeles Times wrote that "The virtues of the individual movies are almost beside the point, since it's hard to imagine why anyone would want to pick up the thread at this late date, but Saw V is a particularly dull and discombobulated affair, shot and acted with all the flair of a basic-cable procedural".
Some reviews were positive, however. British website Digital Spy was relatively positive about the movie, however, rating it 3/5 stars and commending the film for its "solid acting, slick direction and suitably filthy cinematography too", while also stating it will "make far more sense to those familiar with the previous installments".IGN awarded the movie with 3 out of 5 stars stating that the movie ties up most of the loose ends of the previous 4 installments while also having a more straightforward and less complicated storyline. They also praised the traps for being the most inventive and best that the Saw franchise has had to offer.
Download links
http://rapidshare.com/files/162247577/coa-saw5-xvid.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/162247170/coa-saw5-xvid.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/162247672/coa-saw5-xvid.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/162246429/coa-saw5-xvid.part4.rar
Or Netload (Interchangable)
http://netload.in/dateiMzcyMzc2NT/coa-saw5-xvid.part1.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateiNTI4NzYxMD/coa-saw5-xvid.part2.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateiMTc1NjI3Mz/coa-saw5-xvid.part3.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateiMTI4NDYxMj/coa-saw5-xvid.part4.rar.htm
The movie received generally negative reviews from critics. The review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reported that 12% of critics gave the movie positive reviews, based on 57 reviews — with the consensus that "If its plot were as interesting as its torture devices, or its violence less painful than its performances, perhaps Saw V might not feel like it was running on fumes." Metacritic reported the film had an average score of 20 out of 100, based on 10 reviews.
Elizabeth Weizman of the New York Daily News believed that the lack of Tobin Bell's character hurt the movie: "Bell's deliciously twisted madman was the lifeline of this series, and without him, we're left watching a routine horror flick that might as well have gone straight to DVD. The series began with two major assets that set it apart: the concept of a brilliantly righteous executioner, and the actor who played him. Now, aside from Bell's brief, intermittent cameos, it has neither. So where the original Saw was diabolical fun, this fifth installment is as bloodless as the most unfortunate of Jigsaw's victims." Sam Adams of the Los Angeles Times wrote that "The virtues of the individual movies are almost beside the point, since it's hard to imagine why anyone would want to pick up the thread at this late date, but Saw V is a particularly dull and discombobulated affair, shot and acted with all the flair of a basic-cable procedural".
Some reviews were positive, however. British website Digital Spy was relatively positive about the movie, however, rating it 3/5 stars and commending the film for its "solid acting, slick direction and suitably filthy cinematography too", while also stating it will "make far more sense to those familiar with the previous installments".IGN awarded the movie with 3 out of 5 stars stating that the movie ties up most of the loose ends of the previous 4 installments while also having a more straightforward and less complicated storyline. They also praised the traps for being the most inventive and best that the Saw franchise has had to offer.
Download links
http://rapidshare.com/files/162247577/coa-saw5-xvid.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/162247170/coa-saw5-xvid.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/162247672/coa-saw5-xvid.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/162246429/coa-saw5-xvid.part4.rar
Or Netload (Interchangable)
http://netload.in/dateiMzcyMzc2NT/coa-saw5-xvid.part1.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateiNTI4NzYxMD/coa-saw5-xvid.part2.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateiMTc1NjI3Mz/coa-saw5-xvid.part3.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateiMTI4NDYxMj/coa-saw5-xvid.part4.rar.htm
0 comments:
Post a Comment